Friday, September 4, 2026
PrimeBulletin

Ongoing story

Firmness Without Conflict: Why Bangladesh Needs a New Strategy in Relations with India

Firmness Without Conflict: Why Bangladesh Needs a New Strategy in Relations with India

The extradition demand for former Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina remains a major legal and political issue for Bangladesh, with Dhaka submitting a formal request to New Delhi. India has acknowledged the request, stating that it is being processed under its legal framework. While this represents a sensitive chapter in bilateral relations, diplomatic analysts argue that a single extradition case should not become the sole axis around which all Dhaka-Delhi dynamics revolve.

Strategic observers emphasize that while Bangladesh can maintain a firm stance on Sheikh Hasina's extradition, core bilateral sectors—including trade, energy, water resources, border security, transport connectivity, and regional cooperation—must continue moving forward. Restricting a broad bilateral relationship to a single dispute risks undermining long-term national interests.

Recent public statements by Foreign Minister Khalilur Rahman and Foreign Affairs Adviser Humayun Kabir have highlighted the extradition request. However, analysts note that insulating economic and strategic cooperation from this single issue remains vital for Bangladesh's economic stability.


The Economic and Supply-Chain Reality

Geography remains an unalterable reality in Bangladesh-India relations. In the 2024–25 fiscal year, bilateral trade between the two nations reached approximately $11.39 billion. Bangladesh imported roughly $9.62 billion worth of goods from India while exporting $1.76 billion, resulting in a trade deficit of $7.86 billion.


While the deficit presents long-term economic concerns, a significant portion of imports consists of essential food items, industrial raw materials, and intermediate inputs crucial for domestic manufacturing.


The readymade garment (RMG) and textile sectors illustrate this structural interdependence. In 2024, Bangladesh imported 1.215 million tons of yarn valued at nearly $3 billion, with approximately 95 percent sourced from India. Industry representatives cite competitive pricing, bulk availability, and short transit times as primary reasons for relying on Indian yarn. While sourcing raw materials from alternative international markets remains theoretically possible, higher freight costs and extended lead times could diminish the global competitiveness of Bangladesh's garment exports.


Concurrently, domestic textile spinners face challenges from Indian yarn imports alongside local natural gas supply constraints, highlighting the need for data-driven trade policies that balance domestic industrial protection with export competitiveness.


Energy Security and Governance Responsibilities

Reliable energy supply remains critical to industrial performance. Gas shortages have disrupted factory operations in recent months, impacting the primary textile sector where substantial capital is invested. Unpredictable energy supplies risk delay in export deliveries, threatening international buyer confidence and new capital investment.


Political analysts point out a distinct structural difference between political opposition strategies and executive governance. While political parties such as Jamaat-e-Islami and the National Citizen Party (NCP) can leverage firm nationalist rhetoric against India, the government bears the operational responsibility of maintaining industrial output, securing energy imports, managing border trade, and negotiating water-sharing agreements.


Differentiating Nationalism from Unilateral Anti-India Rhetoric

A core debate within Bangladesh's domestic political landscape centers on foreign policy strategy. Analysts caution against conflating national interest with blanket anti-India sentiment:


Pragmatic Nationalism: Focuses on decisions that yield tangible economic, strategic, and security benefits for Bangladesh.

  • Populist Framing: Attributes complex domestic challenges—such as inflation, energy deficits, or banking sector vulnerabilities—solely to external factors, potentially obscuring internal structural causes.

A decline in bilateral relations carries economic implications, including higher import costs, supply chain bottlenecks, and reduced investor confidence, which directly impact living standards and employment.


Water Sharing, Border Security, and Strategic Diversification

Bangladesh and India share 54 transboundary rivers, making continuous bilateral engagement essential for agricultural productivity, environmental protection, and human livelihoods. Major pending issues, including the renewal of the Ganga Water Treaty, require ongoing technical and political dialogue that functions independently of specific political disputes.

Similarly, bilateral cooperation remains central to border management and anti-trafficking efforts. Addressing cross-border smuggling, narcotics, human trafficking, and regional security challenges requires structured coordination between both nations.

Diplomatic experts advocate for market and supply-chain diversification—deepening ties with China, Japan, South Korea, the United States, the European Union, and Gulf nations—to reduce over-reliance on any single partner. However, due to regional transit routes connecting Nepal, Bhutan, and Northeast India, practical cooperation with India remains integral to Bangladesh's goal of becoming a regional trade hub.


The Path Forward for 'Bangladesh First'

The 'Bangladesh First' policy framework faces a practical test. For the policy to serve national priorities, observers outline several core requirements:

Maintaining industrial export competitiveness and raw material access

  • Securing stable gas and power supplies for domestic manufacturing

    Negotiating equitable water-sharing arrangements across transboundary rivers

    Managing border security and regional connectivity frameworks

    Pursuing balanced diplomatic relations with all major global and regional partners


Ultimately, diplomatic analysts conclude that maintaining a firm legal stance on Sheikh Hasina's extradition and safeguarding broader national economic interests are not mutually exclusive. A pragmatic foreign policy requires keeping bilateral trade, energy security, and regional diplomacy operational while pursuing legal avenues through established channels.

More